Showing posts with label the 2016 hugo awards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the 2016 hugo awards. Show all posts

Monday, April 4, 2016

The 2016 Hugos: What Did YOU Pick?

The first votes for the Hugo are in, and the nominations are now being tallied! Alas, I don't have time to discuss my entire ballot, but let's highlight a few folks who earned my nominating vote this year and explain, in brief, what impressed me about their work:

1.) Andy Weir, of course, was an obvious pick. As I wrote in my 2014 review of The Martian: "[I]t helps that Weir's protagonist is a really likable guy. Most of the story is told using Watney's personal logs, and the voice that emerges is one that, in a way, reminds me of my own father's. Like Dad, Watney primarily uses gallows humor to battle his fear. When he's not ruminating over his "Mark Watney Doesn't Die" project, he's musing about the Cubs, bitching about his mission commander's poor taste in entertainment, or complaining about his boring diet. And yes -- I laughed. Despite Watney's constantly being in mortal danger, I laughed out loud at the first person passages and the way certain things were phrased. [...] [O]verall, I found Weir's view of humanity deeply inspiring. Beyond Watney's resourcefulness and pluck, we also see people on Earth - and on the Hermes - drawing on what is best in themselves and accomplishing great things. [...] I won't spoil the story and tell you whether these efforts succeed; I will tell you, though, that the level of cooperation involved actually made me cry." Weir has demonstrated that you can write diamond-hard science fiction without jettisoning the human element. For this contribution, I was more than happy to nominate him for the John W. Campbell Award.

2.) Chuck Gannon, meanwhile, got a vote for the depth of his sociopolitical space opera. Full disclosure: Chuck tuckerized me in a later chapter of Raising Caine -- but I assure you that is not the reason I've been putting him on my Hugo ballot for the past three years. I've had the great privilege to see, in several presentations, how Chuck has put the universe in the Caine Riordan series together, and the profundity of the thought behind said universe richly deserves recognition. His extrapolation into the future of Earth is eminently credible, and his alien cultures are terrifically conceived.

3.) I also joined my fellow Puppies in nominating Megan Grey's "Tuesdays with Molakesh the Destroyer." Generally speaking, I prefer SF to fantasy, but this particular short story is simply irresistible. Why? It's nice. Instead of emphasizing the negative, it searches for something deeper and more true. Instead of dwelling on anger, it chooses mercy, assuring the reader that today's trials are transitory and not worth seeking feral vengeance. 

So, readers: What did you vote for? What excited you this season? Let me know in the comments, please. I want this thread to be devoted to a pure celebration of our favorite works!  

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

A Hugo Deadline Approacheth!

Many apologies for my failure to write real posts over the past week or so. 
I've been insanely busy.

I do, however, want to drop a note to remind everyone that the nominations window for the 2016 Hugo Awards closes tomorrow night at 11:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time.
(For those of us on the eastern coast of the USA, that's 2:59 AM on April 1.)

On Monday, I will discuss my personal ballot. 
In the meantime, I encourage everyone to vote their consciences!

Friday, December 11, 2015

Sad Puppies 4: The Embigginning

Yesterday, Kate the Impaler officially announced the start of Sad Puppies 4:
The time has come, the walrus said… Except it was actually the huge manatee, and what he said was “HOON!”
Because yes, it is time to start Sad Puppies 4 in Earnest. And Houston. And Philadelphia. And Back-o-Beyond. You get the idea.
Nominations will open in January 2016, and probably close in March (the closing date hasn’t been officially announced). I’m planning to have The List posted mid to late February (depending, as always, on just how feral my work schedule happens to be). Recommendations have been trickling in, but we need more. MOAR!
Yes, we do. And guys? The recommendation process is wide open -- deliberately. Contra the claims of our Puppy kicking critics, our goal here is to broaden participation, not to keep people out. So if you have a favorite work - or twelve - that you would like to see make our list, then please stop by our website and make your voice heard!

Sorry, folks: I'll go back to writing real posts again next week. :\