tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post6863887654485343133..comments2023-10-31T05:22:37.723-07:00Comments on The Right Geek: Why I'm Backing #NeverTrump: A "Cuckservative" SpeaksThe Right Geekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comBlogger72125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-80293556062377730192016-03-30T23:46:57.449-07:002016-03-30T23:46:57.449-07:00In our simple life, love plays a very specific rol...In our simple life, love plays a very specific role.Now we are able to make your love life healthy and it has no space for any type trouble. These all are possible with the help of AGBAZARA TEMPLE OF SOLUTION. He helped me cast a spell that brought my long lost lover back withing 48hours who left me for another woman. you can also contact him on ( agbazara@gmail.com ) or call him on +2348104102662 and be happy forever like am now with his experience. <br /><br />BETTY from USAbloggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03361286358896892000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-19960169204855605292016-03-22T12:24:56.659-07:002016-03-22T12:24:56.659-07:00Hey, jls: Just want to let you know that I'm n...Hey, jls: Just want to let you know that I'm not ignoring you. I'm just away from my desk today. :) I fully intend to respond to your concerns, however, so stay tuned!The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-31923703095861907382016-03-22T10:21:47.235-07:002016-03-22T10:21:47.235-07:00Here's a second example.The first was Racism, ...Here's a second example.The first was Racism, this one goes to Sexism.<br /><br />March 22, 2016<br />The Washington Post reporter who — based on a single word, "beautiful" — said Trump "hit on" her.<br /> At 2:34 yesterday, WaPo's Karen Attiah tweeted:<br />So. I got hit on today by Donald Trump.<br />No context. No detail. It wasn't until 7:02 PM that she put up a column: "I asked Trump a policy question. Then he called me 'beautiful.'" Trump had been talking with a group of WaPo editors for over an hour and:<br />As the meeting ended and we were walking out of the room, I thanked Trump for taking my question. He turned to me and said, “I really hope I answered your question,” and added casually with a smile, “Beautiful.” I was stunned. I didn’t say thank you, and I don’t think I smiled. He then walked out to meet with my Post colleagues briefly before heading to the elevator. I stayed in the conference room for a few minutes as it sunk in that the potential GOP nominee for president thought it was okay to comment on my appearance. Did he just say that?<br />The first thing I need to know is, what was Attiah's response to his "I really hope I answered your question"? If she said "yes, thanks" or nodded or gave any kind of positive response, then "beautiful" would tend to mean "Great" as in I'm glad you're satisfied with my answer.<br /><br /> It's at least ambiguous. I can understand the psychology of a woman wondering if she was just called beautiful, but this was a very particular woman, a reporter who seems eager to hurt Donald Trump. She stayed in the conference room thinking... exactly what? That she could immediately tweet out "I got hit on today by Donald Trump."jlshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14665075024864657229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-51785769136472662932016-03-22T08:54:35.985-07:002016-03-22T08:54:35.985-07:00Here is an example of what i am talking about.
Th...Here is an example of what i am talking about.<br /><br />Theodore "Theo" Olson, a special education teacher at Como Park High School in St. Paul, Minn., was placed on administrative leave March 9 over two posts he wrote on Facebook about student discipline in the school district.<br /><br />The posts were deemed offensive by former school board candidate turned Black Lives Matter activist Rashad Turner who reportedly accused Olson of being a racist. Turner said Olson’s posts show he is “the epitome of a bad teacher” and a “white supremacist,” EAGnews.org reported.<br /><br />According to the website, Olson wrote on Facebook, “Anyone care to explain to me the school-to-prison pipeline my colleagues and I have somehow created, or perpetuated, or not done enough to interrupt? Because if you can’t prove it, the campaigns you’ve waged to deconstruct adult authority in my building by enabling student misconduct, you seriously owe us real teachers an apology. Actually, an apology won’t cut it.”<br /><br />"Phones and iPad devices, used for social media and gaming," wrote Olson. "There have always been rules for ‘devices,’ and defined levels of misconduct. Since we now have no backup, no functional location to send kids who won’t quit gaming, setting up fights, selling drugs, whoring trains, or cyber bullying, we’re screwed, just designing our own classroom rules.”<br /><br />The group, Black Lives Matter St. Paul, charged that Olson portrayed students as drug dealers and gang bangers in his Facebook posts about a lack of district support in discipline matters, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported. Black Lives Matter had threatened a “shut-down action” at the school if Olson was not fired, but the group did not follow through with it after Turner reportedly met with St. Paul superintendent Valeria Silva. jlshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14665075024864657229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-77764247258532097602016-03-21T19:10:53.821-07:002016-03-21T19:10:53.821-07:00Thanks for the response but I must say I was surpr...Thanks for the response but I must say I was surprised. My surprise makes me think I didn’t communicate very well.<br /><br />My concern is not so much persuading the left as understanding how a solid conservative, well read and a good thinker as you are, could end up where you are relative to Trump. I read your piece and was struck by your conclusion:<br /><br />“And that leads me to what bothers me the most about Trump: his rhetoric. The ugly things he says and the ugly things he promotes are things I don't want associated with the conservative label. There's fighting political correctness and then there's just being an asshole -- and Trump has frequently slipped into that second bracket.”<br /><br />I pick this out because as you say it is “what bothers me the most about Trump: his rhetoric”. I should also point out that I have heard the same sentiment from others, so I think it is an important point. For those others, it often comes down to how the left has characterized what Trump said, more than what he actually said. Those others are just average ‘walk around’ people so I am not surprise their information is filtered. I would be surprised if that were true of you.<br /><br />My concern is that we of the conservative persuasion are allowing ourselves to be put into a box which requires us to talk in such a way that we can not be misunderstood or mischaracterized. I think it was Karl Popper who said "It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." And I think he was right.<br /><br />I realize now that I should have first asked for an example where Trump has slipped from fighting political correctness into becoming just an asshole. I assumed you were referring to Trumps use of the term ‘rapist’ or ‘Muslim’ but perhaps I was wrong. Are there any others? and are those the main issues?<br />jlshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14665075024864657229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-23100394898354106462016-03-21T13:11:35.886-07:002016-03-21T13:11:35.886-07:00There is a fundamental error talking about the Rep...There is a fundamental error talking about the Republican or Democrat Party. That is referring to voters as if they are part of the "Party". This is like referring to Walmart shoppers as being part of "Walmart".<br /><br />You are a member of a party only if you have been/are elected or appointed in that party and are giving at least a few thousand dollars each year in support. You are in that party because you want to direct what government does to set regulations, spend money on your businesses, and to convert your personal position into cash.<br /><br />Each party's presentation to the public is about policy: ethics, morals, and grand issues. This is a cover story for the economic interests of the true party. Both parties are flexible coalitions of people who can win votes or who want to buy results from the government.<br /><br />Primaries, elections, and voting are used by the parties to:<br />* Mollify the public with a feeling of participation and self-rule<br />* Raise more money from smaller, ideological contributions<br />* Identify those within the parties who have the knack for the<br /> most sincere sounding lies and for getting votes.<br /><br />The Dems have a system of super-delegates and the proportional award of ordinary delegates. This assures that the choice of the Dem party will be nominated. Obama surpassed Hillary for the 2008 nomination because he won over the party, not because he won more ordinary delegates.<br /><br />The Pubs have it a bit harder. Pub voters are more fragmented than the Dems and the Pub party has to maintain the fiction that many views are accepted. The strategy this year was to support many candidates who would split the votes in the primaries, allowing Jeb! Bush to win a plurality of the delegates with his deep funding for political operatives and advertisements.<br /> - - Trump upset this plan, but will face the bureaucracy of the Pub party in rulemaking and arm twising at the convention, likely to give the nomination to a party favorite.<br /><br />The Pub party is a marketing division of the Dem dominated Uniparty. It makes noise but accomplishes almost nothing. There are no official plans or projects to win public sentiment and actually take some control.<br /><br />* The Dems have numerous protest factions to drive public commentary and dominate the news. Where are the similar groups supported by the Pubs? Why haven't the Pubs bought a network to present the other side of stories?<br /><br />* Where are the official and announced plans to run the country differently:<br />- No alternative to Obamacare, only the promise of repeal now fading away.<br />- Noise but no action on deficits and the budget. Pubs talk about cutting spending, then increase it along with the Dems. They don't try to advertise their supposed fiscal policy.<br />- What is the "Republican" or "Conservative" policy? The party has chosen not to publish, define, and explain. So, one can be a Pub without supporting any particular agenda.<br />- Where are the official educational efforts to explain better policies to support future elections?<br />- Where is the official Pub outrage at speech restrictions on college campuses?<br /><br />A Uniparty which merely ignored conservative policy would attract the outright anger of right-leaning voters. They would attempt to form an opposition party. The Pubs have served the purpose of attracting those voters to a stand-in party which in reality accomplishes very little.<br /><br />This is slowly being understood and accounts for the angry mood of 40% of the country. Trump is supported by this realization. We can only hope that he won't be a narcissistic dictator and will accomplish some dismantling of the leftist Uniparty machine.<br /><br />Even if he is the next elected dictator in the style of Obama, at least he will be scrutinized by a leftist press and will not have an established machine to multiply his powers. Hillary would have the support of the press and that established political machine.<br /><br />I like Ted Cruise better for his knowledge and fewer flaws. But, if anger and ignorance choose Trump, then I want Trump instead of Hillary.<br />Andrew_M_Garlandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02855052302054611917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-25885960858739357982016-03-21T13:10:46.695-07:002016-03-21T13:10:46.695-07:00To set the tone:
( fgfbooks.com/Sobran-Joe/Sobran-...To set the tone:<br />( fgfbooks.com/Sobran-Joe/Sobran-bio.html )<br />Joseph Sobran (1946–2010) was senior editor of National Review for 18 years, a writer, and syndicated columnist.<br />=== ===<br />Democracy has proved that the best way to gain power over people is to assure them that they are ruling themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully submissive slaves.<br />=== ===<br />Andrew_M_Garlandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02855052302054611917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-48425188027192975382016-03-20T18:35:39.613-07:002016-03-20T18:35:39.613-07:00I have more, but I will stop there. before I sign ...I have more, but I will stop there. before I sign off, I want to congratulate Stephanie S. for a cogent and well argued essay. I wish I could give her some good news, but I can't. Be of good cheer Stephanie, God loves you.Fat Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09554029467445000453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-26664130681106307862016-03-20T18:32:26.308-07:002016-03-20T18:32:26.308-07:00I fully expect that if Trump is nominated, the med...I fully expect that if Trump is nominated, the media and the Democrats (which are one and the same thing) will set off a VEI 8 supervolcano of anti-Trump mud. It will be all Trump all the time on every network.<br /><br />You will hear about all of his frauds and the widows and the orphans he ripped off. You will here about every adultery, and every divorce. You will hear about his numerous bankruptcies. And, you will hear every one of his vulgarities, and his stupidities. You will reach the point where you break out in hives if you see or hear his name.<br /><br />And, no, Hillary’s felonies will get no airtime at all.<br /><br />Right now the all time record low vote for a presidential election with only 2 serious candidates, is 1964, when Barry Goldwater garnered 38.5% of the vote. I think that will set the over/under for Trump. I am also expecting record low turnout, a wipeout of Republican candidates for Senate, and a possible change in control of the House.Fat Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09554029467445000453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-86070455011672615902016-03-20T18:30:56.062-07:002016-03-20T18:30:56.062-07:00I have been asked what should be done about Trump....I have been asked what should be done about Trump. I wish I had a good answer. I don't.<br /><br />To me the puzzle isn't Trump, his egomania and character as a flim-flam man explain everything about him.<br /><br />What I cannot explain is the vast number of his Trumpeters, and the strength of their convictions. Trump himself said of them that he could shoot somebody in the middle of 5th Avenue and they would still support him.<br /><br />I have seen their comments all over the internet whenever The Donald is criticized. It seems to me that they believe in the image that they themselves have created of a messiah who will smite their enemies, right the injustices that have been done to them, and lead them into the promised land. Needless to say, that image and reality coincide at precisely zero points.<br /><br />I am reminded of an aphorism by Charles MacKay who wrote, aptly enough, "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" in the Preface to the Edition of 1852 he wrote:<br /><br />"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."Fat Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09554029467445000453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-36244231962153034602016-03-20T18:29:09.683-07:002016-03-20T18:29:09.683-07:00To those people who think that Hillary would be wo...To those people who think that Hillary would be worse than Trump:<br /><br />I agree with you that Hillary is a felon, who is completely unfitted to hold any office of honor or trust, public or private. I also understand that Hillary is a left wing ideologue, a disciple of Alinsky, and far to the left of her husband, Bill.<br /><br />I understand that Hilliary’s election will result in Anthony Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court being occupied by a Mexican Lesbian Communist Dwarf who will vote against first and second amendment rights, and for forcing school children to participate in homosexual orgies. I would also remind you that the conservatives on the Supreme Court were unable to block the most blatantly unconstitutional legislation ever, Obamacare, thanks to the Dirty Little Coward.<br /><br />I understand all of that. On the other hand, I think that the House will remain in Republican hands, and that the Senate, even if the Democrats take control this year, will revert to Republican control in 2018. I also believe that the Republicans in the House and the Senate will oppose Hillary's agenda, and will not give her many legislative victories.<br /><br />The Donald, if he were President, would, according to his own statements, present a legislative agenda little different from Hillary’s. As a deal maker, and a friend and confidant of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid (yes, I know he will retire, but Schumer will take his place and is also a Trump buddy), Trump, having no conservative ideas in his head will be rolled by the Democrats in Congress. Republicans split by party loyalty, and by their own craven sucking up to The Donald, will be unable to mount an effective resistance to him. The damage will be tremendous.<br /><br />Conservatism will be discredited and driven from the public arena. When the whole thing blows to smithereens. Caused by a recession that is overdue, the opposition party will be Bernie’s socialists who will proceed to turn the United States into Venezuela.<br /><br />I fear Hillary, but I fear the Donald more.Fat Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09554029467445000453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-90276465451431914432016-03-20T18:24:26.366-07:002016-03-20T18:24:26.366-07:00If I started talking about the alternatives, the l...If I started talking about the alternatives, the length of this post would've gotten ridiculous. Don't worry, though: I intend to write a post on Cruz sometime next week. ;)The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-56515505400191355002016-03-20T18:09:32.370-07:002016-03-20T18:09:32.370-07:00Good article, and I agree with all your reservatio...Good article, and I agree with all your reservations regarding Trump. But I have one objection, why didn't you mention the most obvious anti Trump, Ted Cruz. He still has a real chance to beat Trump, and is a very sound Tea Party liberty candidate.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18268431913030605631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-64455274792120029362016-03-20T13:13:28.636-07:002016-03-20T13:13:28.636-07:00c) Kill suspected terrorists' families
d) Roug...c) Kill suspected terrorists' families<br />d) Rough up political opponents<br />e) Leave SS and Medicare unchanged<br />f) Touchback Amnesty<br />g) Smoot-Hawley redux<br /><br />And that's before you get to the doctrinaire liberal positions he held on abortion, gun control, etc. just a few years ago. Has he actually changed his mind, or is he simply telling you what you want to hear?heedlesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09724542007669637338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-74113368049119660052016-03-20T09:10:39.187-07:002016-03-20T09:10:39.187-07:00And now a more general note:
I didn't reply t...And now a more general note:<br /><br />I didn't reply to everyone because I can't. I WOULD like to ask that everyone here read the comments I DID leave and consider them in good faith.<br /><br />I don't believe I attacked anyone save Trump -- and even then, I attacked him on the substance AFTER giving due respects to the anxieties he represents. In return, some of you have chosen to mock me and call me names. Fine -- that's your choice, and I will let it speak for itself.The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-8892814173178393772016-03-20T08:46:04.430-07:002016-03-20T08:46:04.430-07:00Thank you for your civil response. You raise an ex...Thank you for your civil response. You raise an excellent question I will do my best to answer.<br /><br />I think the key issue on which this whole discussion of "tone" turns is our personal estimation of the size of the unpersuadable left. I don't want to speak for you, but I'm guessing your estimate is larger than mine.<br /><br />There is no question that said unpersuadable left has managed to grab hold of some very hefty megaphones -- and has consequently made the explication of conservative views extraordinarily taxing and risky. But those megaphones? I think they make that left seem more numerous than it actually is.<br /><br />Allow me to deploy a personal example to explain what I mean: When my brother - also a conservative - married my very lovely sister-in-law a few years ago, she was a pretty convinced Democrat. Now? She is still left-leaning -- but also somewhat less convinced. How did this happen? Matt didn't "water down" his political beliefs -- but he expressed them <b>within the context of a loving and attentive relationship.</b> He LISTENED to his wife's concerns and acknowledged them -- then turned the tables and explained his own worries. He was committed to the truth -- but also to having an actual human conversation. <br /><br />Now obviously, we can't marry every Democrat-leaning voter we come across. But I think the relationship principle my brother's marriage makes manifest IS more generally applicable. That's why I mentioned the importance of going out into the community -- of building around and under. If we make an active effort reach out to people - instead of depending on the unreliable media - we can put a face on conservatism that ISN'T as scary and threatening WITHOUT jettisoning the facts. The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-5028763540606013782016-03-20T08:04:16.995-07:002016-03-20T08:04:16.995-07:00Actually, Ted Cruz was not my first choice precise...Actually, Ted Cruz was not my first choice precisely because of his tactical errors. But I'll bite: Yes, Cruz IS better than Trump because, at base, he cares about persuading people instead of manipulating them through tribal appeals. The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-86491764143809561902016-03-20T07:48:29.800-07:002016-03-20T07:48:29.800-07:00"But I'll nevertheless make the point: a ..."But I'll nevertheless make the point: a commitment to not vote for Trump is a commitment to letting Hillary win..."<br /><br />As I noted above in another comment, this is the key issue on which you and I differ. While I acknowledged the possibility in the original post, I'm actually not fully convinced that my refusing to vote for Trump will scuttle the GOP's chances. Actually, I think Trump is going to do that on his own. The polls right now show him trailing both Hillary and Bernie in one-on-one match ups -- and right now, based on the facts on the ground as I see them, I don't see that changing once the primaries are over.<br /><br />"I've happily voted for Reagan twice, somewhat less happily voted for two diferent Bushes four times, and held my nose and voted for Dole (1996), McCain (2008) and Romney (2012). This election will be a happy one if it's Cruz, a nose-holder if it's Trump."<br /><br />I was just barely too young to vote in 1996, but from 2000 onward, I have always voted Republican. Believe me, I understand what it means to "hold my nose." But to me, there's a critical difference between those previous candidates and Donald Trump. As flawed as Bush Jr., McCain, and Romney were, I at least sensed that they actually cared about what was good for the country. I don't get that feeling from Trump. Instead, I feel that Trump cares about one thing only: the greater glory and power of Trump. Further, I don't trust him not to govern as a statist once he's in office; the fact that he's backed left-wing statists in the past does nothing to inspire confidence. Perhaps you feel differently -- but that's where *I* stand.<br /><br />"At the risk of second-guessing the motives of Trump's opponents, maybe I think the country is more important than the party, or even the so-called "conservative brand"."<br /><br />I find this pretty insulting. While I'm concerned about the "conservative brand," that concern ultimately flows from my deep and passionate anxiety about our country and about the values and profound philosophical insights upon which our country was based. <br /><br />This is how I see it: If Donald Trump is allowed to represent what is supposed to be the party of traditional American values, EVERY attempt to fight for those values will INSTANTLY lose all credibility. <br /><br />I'll reiterate and amplify what I said in the original post: How can we ask for toleration -- then turn around and back a man who, based on the things he's said and done, feels comfortable strong-arming people instead of persuading them? How can we argue for the rule of law -- then back a man who thrives on stirring up the masses?<br /><br />Bush Jr., McCain and Romney were all imperfect conservatives, but they were all, still, classically liberal in their temperaments. Trump doesn't seem to know what it means to be classically liberal; on the contrary, he seems to think the illiberal Alinksy approach should be universally adopted. <br /><br />You seem to think that Trump will simply be another "bad Republican." I see it differently. I think Trump will be the very leader who will usher in an all-out civil war. <br /><br />I'm not putting party or self over country. I'm trying to SAVE my country and the values I hold dear. The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-56328123742223586062016-03-20T07:07:03.909-07:002016-03-20T07:07:03.909-07:00"I also think that right now conservatives ne..."I also think that right now conservatives need to be focused on why Cruz or Kasich are better candidates and not tearing down Trump. That only hurts us all."<br /><br />This, actually, is a fair comment. Tearing down Trump is NOT the only thing we should be doing. I will endeavor to explain the positives of our remaining options in the next week or so, but in the meantime, let me link to something that made me a little more inclined to like Cruz (who actually wasn't my first choice either):<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi5IZ9StVUI<br /><br />Here, Cruz actually shows the capacity to listen and TALK to people instead of manipulating them with a clever us vs. them narrative. If I had to describe my ideal candidate, that would be one characteristic I'd certainly prize.The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-87127350262741975092016-03-20T07:00:32.342-07:002016-03-20T07:00:32.342-07:00Ahem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0GMcYD2Oz8...Ahem:<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0GMcYD2Oz8<br /><br />If you like, I can find more. Everything I wrote about Donald Trump in the original post is based on things he's ACTUALLY said. I'm not a liar, a sheep, or an idiot, and I don't even listen to Glenn Beck. Please get over yourself.The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-87898362562178700332016-03-20T06:50:41.425-07:002016-03-20T06:50:41.425-07:00Just a note: You don't have to believe in any ...Just a note: You don't have to believe in any conspiracy theories about Planned Parenthood to believe that our tax dollars shouldn't be used to fund elective procedures. Well-woman care? Maybe -- but even here, we can find a better alternative than an organization founded by a eugenicist that, yes, DOES murder innocent human beings whether you believe it then goes on to sell the body parts or not.The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-89913118937948703582016-03-20T06:41:28.214-07:002016-03-20T06:41:28.214-07:00I'm not voting for Hillary either. Or Bernie. ...I'm not voting for Hillary either. Or Bernie. If it comes down to Trump v. Hillary or Trump v. Bernie, I'm voting conservative -- wherever I can find it.<br /><br />I understand many people interpret that as an implicit vote for Hillary. That's where people who are willing to vote for Trump (either enthusiastically or no) and I differ: While I've acknowledged the possibility, I am less convinced that this particular interpretation is right. Trump's unfavorables are so pronounced that I don't believe he'll win the general even WITH my vote.The Right Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649094767960738820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-80702890915116930752016-03-20T06:21:16.986-07:002016-03-20T06:21:16.986-07:00What you don't understand about us Trump suppo...What you don't understand about us Trump supporters is we don't care what you think anymore. As the Donald says, we are tired of losing, tired of taking the blame for things we did not do. Call us whatever names you want, we don't care. That's what pissing you Cucks off. you still care and wonder why we don't. This country is f'd anyway. we are going down fighting and could care less what you think.<br /><br />Also, career tip, if you are only making $30k a year, perhaps you drop the blogging and get and take a second job so you can get more of those cheap Chinese panties you love.Attila99https://www.blogger.com/profile/15754474191075132640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-77234190970247403472016-03-20T05:59:21.466-07:002016-03-20T05:59:21.466-07:00Well said sir...too bad those to whom it is direct...Well said sir...too bad those to whom it is directed won't read it...Rich Vailhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17858759001158247969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4588236197446203618.post-55134388607345151312016-03-20T05:56:06.078-07:002016-03-20T05:56:06.078-07:00Yet, you ignore the Isreali model which is VERY ef...Yet, you ignore the Isreali model which is VERY effective...that's the template we need to use a fortified zone 100 yards wide with more than a single "wall" but instead a series of belts...with mine fields and patrols to make sure it remains effective. What we have now is nothing...Rich Vailhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17858759001158247969noreply@blogger.com